The problem of dual entry and having to maintain parallel project management platforms remains a persistent problem in construction, according toa new SmartMarket Report from Dodge Data & Analytics。
Working from an online survey of construction owners and contractors, the report found that 42% of contractors reported that they had worked on a project where they had to use the owner’s preferred PM software alongside their own. Almost three quarters of contractors said double entry on multiple PM systems had impacted their productivity.
道奇行业见解的研究总监唐娜·拉基达拉·卡尔（Donna Laquidara-Carr）说：“我们确实听到了有关由于输入双重数据而流失的报道。”“所有者没有看到承包商的时间损失。[研究发现新利luck] 42％的业主认为承包商的风险并没有增加，但这是错误的。”
“Since the dawn of project management systems, the notion of who owns what data and how you choose what to use it has been a source of conflict,” says Chris Bell, vice president of marketing for e-Builder, which commissioned the Dodge study. “Owners are leaning in and becoming authorities on how they want the project managed and have cost control. They’re getting into the software decisions.”
贝尔说，它是根据电子建设者与管理许多项目合作的一些经验来委托新利luck这项研究的。18luck官网他说，所有者和承包商之间使用哪种系统的紧张局势可能会在一些更大的工作上沸腾。贝尔说：“这项研究的真新利luck正目的是衡量该动态的毒性和流行率。”“这如何影响承包商和所有者？”
When owners are increasingly requiring contractors to use project management software, only 16% of contractors reported that they were already using the same PM software as the contractor. Having to work in both the owner’s and their own software is surprisingly common, especially on submittals.
根据Laquidara-Carr的说法，道奇发现，在并行PM系统中工作的承包商增加了数据输入错误的机会，而PM系统可以从同步中逐渐消失，而无需付出额外的劳动来监视系统。这进一步受到许多承包商必须与之合作的有限技术预算的限制。当我们与承包商交谈时，并不是他们对技术的抵抗力，而是他们没有很多钱可以花。他们想要最大的爆炸，”她说。
“我们现在看到的是承包商a better position [regarding adoption of PM software] than where they were in the past, but it could be better,” says Laquidara-Carr. “Contractors are working to stay on top of new software, but as they gain more of an understanding they see the more they can do. The report really supports that contractors are still on that journey.”
