美国最高法院在7月31日的裁决中说，使用从军事薪酬和养老金账户转移的资金建设美国 - 墨西哥边境墙，可以继续进行，大法官允许较早的裁决，暂时允许障碍在认为障碍时继续前进，同时考虑到这一裁决。反对派案件的优点。

反对派团体认为，由于将花费25亿美元的转移美国国防部资金。站立。

联邦上诉法院在联邦上诉法院提出的另一项案件涉及36亿美元的军事资金转移到其他国防部建筑计划后，唐纳德·特朗普总统宣布国会拒绝授权资金后宣布全国紧急情况获得这笔钱。

The wall contractors U.S. Army Corps of Engineers chose in 2019 include BFBC, Bozeman, Mont.; Texas Sterling Construction, Houston; Bristol Construction Services, Anchorage Alaska; Burgos Group, Albuquerque; and a Gibraltar-Cadell joint venture, Montgomery, Ala.

还选择了北卡罗来纳州迪金森的Fisher Sand＆Gravel；西南谷建筑商公司，Kiewit的Albuquerque单位；兰迪·金德（Randy Kinder）发掘，密苏里州德克斯特；萨克拉曼多的马丁兄弟建筑。

The list also includes SLS, Galveston, Texas; a joint venture of Posillico Civil and Coastal Environmental Group, Farmingdale, N.Y., and CJW, Santa Ana, Calif.

“每个要考虑这个问题的下级法院都裁定特朗普总统的边界墙是非法的。We’ll be back before the Supreme Court soon to put a stop to Trump’s xenophobic border wall once and for all,” Dror Ladin, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement, adding that the group will seek removal “of every mile of unlawful wall built.”

法院案件的历史很复杂。

去年，加利福尼亚州的一名联邦地方法院裁定，特朗普试图绕过国会和使用军事薪酬和养老金进行墙建设的企图是非法的。但是，最高法院裁定，在考虑案件的优点时，建筑活动可能会暂时继续。

6月，旧金山的联邦上诉法院同意地方法院的同意，其资金的转移是非法的，并且是行政当局的过度。

代表塞拉俱乐部和南部边境社区联盟的ACLU要求高等法院取消去年的命令，以允许建设继续进行。法院的保守派多数拒绝这样做，没有发表评论。

A court minority dissented, which included Justice Stephen Breyer, who said that the group would have let the district court’s order to stop construction stand until case merits could be decided.

“The court’s decision to let construction continue, may operate in effect, as a final judgment,” said Breyer, who wrote the dissent in the 5-4 decision.

地方法院宣布额外的36亿美元转移军事资金的命运被宣布为非法。该案目前正在旧金山的上诉法院审理。

Congress gave the Trump administration $5 billion for wall construction, but it obtained an additional $10 billion by tapping other DOD budgets, including the $6 billion pending before the courts in these two cases.