judging from the dismay that apparently helped convince the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration to change its guidelines for employer-required COVID-19 vaccines—unlike the original guidelines, the latest revision won’t require employers to record adverse reactions in OSHA logs—the industry should keep a sharp eye out for what’s still to come from the agency.

一个新的全面的联邦紧急临时计划orary COVID-19 standard, currently being reviewed by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, could entail even more vexing complications than the recently issued vaccine reaction guidelines. Such emergency temporary standards, executive orders or guidelines already exist in 14 states, but it’s not clear what the Biden administration U.S. Labor Dept., of which OSHA is a part, will learn from those states.

拥有单独的COVID-19日志将防止Covid案件立即改变项目或公司的整体安全图,尤其是因为我们知道Covid-19-19-19s及其原因可能不会反映出雇主的失误。

确定可刻录的区别jury or illness and a reportable one, however, can involve subjective judgements.

Recordables, which require entries in a company’s log, are less severe and generally don’t involve hospitalizations or treatment with drugs or antibiotics.

相比之下,Reboutables需要立即通知OSHA,并且就医疗和无法立即返回工作而产生了更严重的后果。整体安全记录对于新项目的合格承包商很重要,如果公司赢得这些项目,他们可能会帮助公司经理获得更高的薪酬。18luck官网

The record-keeping issues will be important when OSHA issues the temporary emergency federal COVID-19 standard. The Associated General Contractors and other groups ask that the agency “align its protocols” with those issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The often-revised CDC guidelines have already generated a fair amount of confusion as understanding evolves of virus transmission and the effects of the vaccines.

将它们放在同一页面上,使每个人都受益。

Another measure is even more critical. A coalition of employers, through a comment paper prepared by their attorney, has asked for a separate record for virus-related events and illnesses. In other words, OSHA would exempt COVID-19 from OSHA Standard 1904: Injury and Illness Recordkeeping and put virus entries in a different history or list.

该想法部分基于雇主困难的报告,以及长时间花费的时间,以确定雇员之间的COVID案件是否与工作有关,并且属于雇主OSHA 300日志。这种单独的记录方法不会阻止检查。COVID-19案件将保密,但可以向员工或其代表提供个人身份信息。除了OSHA和地方或地区卫生官员以外,没有其他政党可以访问单独的记录。

Under California's emergency temporary COVID-19 standard, employers must contact local health departments when there are three or more COVID-19 cases within a 14-day period in the same workplace, and give health officials information about the employees. This approach would allow the separate log to be useful in contact tracing.

但是,拥有一个单独的COVID-19日志将防止病毒病例立即改变特定项目或工作场所的整体安全情况。尤其如此,因为众所周知,COVID-19传播及其原因可能不会反映出雇主的失误。

Employers can follow all the various and changing rules to prevent transmission, yet still have the virus carried into the workplace.

随着疫苗接种证明了成功和共同的19科学,提供了新的见解,我们期待着最终的临时紧急标准日落,以及对如何应对这一公共卫生危机的新了解,即使在美国586,000美国死亡后获得了临时危机。

该社论是2021年5月26日更新,以反映OSHA指南的最新变化。